Thursday, April 12, 2018

U.S. License Approval For Taiwan Submarine Plan Draws China's Ire

Lawrence Chiu and Evelyn Kao, Focus Taiwan
11 April 2018

The United States' decision to grant a license necessary for American firms to sell Taiwan the technology it needs to build its own submarines has drawn opposition from China.
China resolutely opposes any form of official or military contact between the U.S. and Taiwan, including U.S. arms sales to Taiwan under any pretext, China's Taiwan Affairs Office spokesman Ma Xiaoguang (馬曉光) said at a regular press conference on Wednesday.
The U.S. should adhere to the one-China principle and the three China-U.S. joint communiques governing bilateral relations. Any attempt by the U.S. to "play the Taiwan card" will fail, Ma said.
However, the U.S. contends that the decision was made in accordance with the the Taiwan Relations Act, which requires Washington provide Taiwan with arms and services to defend itself.
U.S. sales of defense articles and services are guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, based on an assessment of Taiwan's defense needs, and in accordance with procedures established by law, a U.S. Department of State spokesperson said on Monday in an e-mail to a CNA reporter on the matter.
"Our longstanding policy on defense sales to Taiwan has been consistent across seven different U.S. administrations. This policy has contributed to the security of Taiwan and also supported the maintenance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait," the spokesperson said.
Taiwan's Ministry of National Defense (MND) said last week it had received reports the U.S. State Department had agreed to grant the marketing license required for American manufacturers to sell technology to Taiwan to allow it to build its own submarines.
Presidential Office spokesman Sydney Lin (林鶴明) said this decision will not only help Taiwan upgrade its self-defense capabilities but also benefit the safety and security of the region.
Taiwan's Presidential Office and the MND thanked the U.S. for its commitment to the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) and the Six Assurances, the cornerstones of U.S.-Taiwan relations.
Taiwan announced last year that it plans to build eight submarines to bolster its current fleet of four aging foreign-built vessels. The move is intended to ensure an adequate defense against Chinese threats and circumvent Beijing's efforts to prevent it from purchasing such technology overseas.

New Undersea Drones Are Smaller, Cheaper And Can Be Refueled Deep Under Water

Victoria Leoni, Defense News
10 April 2018

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — Bright yellow underwater drones were a visible highlight on the exhibition floor here at the Sea-Air-Space Exposition.
Among the autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) featured: a new high-speed, micro-sized vehicle by Hydroid and a subsea drone refueling station by Teledyne Energy.
Hydroid’s Remus M3V is substantially smaller than previous models. With a compact, A-size (36-inch long, 4.875-inch diameter) envelope and no fins or appendages, the vehicle can achieve speeds of more than 10 knots and dive up to 300 meters. It can be used in search and survey; intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR); and multivehicle missions.
With its variable center of gravity, the Remus M3V can also operate in buoy mode. Its key marketing points are its small size, low cost and compatibility with existing AUV operating systems.
“The Navy always wants more with less,” said Justin S. Reid, business development manager at Hydroid. “They want a smaller vehicle that can do the same things as a larger vehicle, and also the price point to match it.”
Teledyne Energy featured its untethered subsea power station at the exposition, along with its Gavia AUV. The Gavia can perform side-scan sonar operations to capture images of the sea floor. It is intended to travel ahead of Navy fleets and transmit oceanographic data back to the vessels.
Teledyne’s subsea power station can remotely refuel the Gavia and other underwater vehicles. Deployable via ship or helicopter, the fuel cell system has an energy storage of 200 kilowatt-hours and an operating depth of 3,000 meters.
Teledyne will demonstrate the subsea power station at the Navy’s Advanced Naval Technology Exercise in August.

Descent of the Machines: Aussie Firm Boasts of Underwater Drone Swarms

Gareth Corfield, The Register
9 April 2018

An Australian company has developed a fleet of underwater drones capable of swarming the seas.
Aquabotix’s Swarmdiver drone can, according to the company, “function as a single coordinated swarm with one human operator,” diving below the sea’s surface “to collect valuable intelligence”.
“Until today, there were simply no micro hybrid USV/UUV (unmanned surface vehicles/unmanned underwater vehicles) and no swarming unmanned vehicles with diving capabilities, commercially available in the industry,” boasted Aquabotix chief exec Whitney Million.
The craft itself weighs 1.7kg, is 75cm long, can dive vertically down to 50m, and is said to be capable of sensing its depth to within 2cm. A “multi-constellation GPS” installation lets the Swarmdiver figure out where it is in the world, while a “wireless data feedback” system is installed on it so it can relay its gathered data home when it surfaces. In itself this is revealing: this underwater drone does not appear to be capable of loitering underwater and relaying real-time data.
This is an explicit pitch of underwater drone technology at the world’s navies. Much of this sort of work tends to stay under the radar (ho ho), as much because it is literally out of sight as well as being a sensitive area, security-wise.
Underwater naval operations are more or less exclusively focused on detecting submarines and gathering related environmental data to either find them or help them stay undetected. Information such as local salinity levels, temperature, water density, the thermocline level and other such environmental stats give vital information to submarine captains – and to the captains of warships hunting for submarines, as we reported last year.
Britain has been making some quiet, and not so quiet, advances of its own in underwater robotic tech; the Unmanned Warrior series of naval exercises tested, among other things, underwater “wave gliders”, which picked up and relayed underwater environmental data to remote processing stations.

US Approves Licence For Taiwan Submarine Plan

Staff, Phys.org
8 April 2018

Washington has agreed to allow US defence contractors help Taiwan construct its own submarines, Taipei said, welcoming the breakthrough in long-standing ambitions to build up its fleet to counter the threat from China.
Taiwan last year launched a plan to manufacture its own submarines amid deteriorating relations with China after its hopes of buying them from the US came to nothing.
The US State Department has approved granting the licence necessary to sell Taiwan the technology needed for its submarine project.
The approval was a "breakthrough," Taiwan defence ministry spokesman Chen Chung-chi said Sunday.
"It is part of a process. We'll take it step by step," he told AFP, declining to provide further details.
The agreement is likely to anger Beijing, which regards the island as part of its territory even though the two sides have been ruled separately since the end of a civil war in 1949.
Washington's approval comes after President Donald Trump last month signed new rules allowing top-level US officials to travel to Taiwan.
China has protested at the move, saying the US should stop official exchanges with Taiwan to avoid "damaging Sino-US relations".
Washington switched diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China in 1979 but maintains trade relations with the island and is its main arms supplier.
Since coming to power in May 2016, President Tsai Ing-wen has pushed for Taiwan to develop and build more of its weapons domestically.
Her office expressed thanks to Washington for the licence approval.
"The US government's decision will not only help Taiwan in raising its defence capabilities, it will also greatly benefit security and stability in the region," it said in a statement Saturday.
Taipei has long struggled to procure submarines from the US.
In April 2001 then-president George W. Bush approved the sale of eight conventional submarines but there had been no progress on the deal, prompting Taipei's decision to build its own.
The United States has not built conventional submarines for more than 40 years and Germany and Spain reportedly declined to offer their designs for fear of offending China.
Taiwan's navy currently operates a fleet of four submarines, bought from abroad but only two of them can be deployed in the event of war.
The other two were built by the United States in the 1940s and are only used in training as they are too old for combat.
The first domestically-built submarine is expected to be deployed within 10 years.

China Dangles Hi-Tech Offers In Race For Arms Sales

Minnie Chan, South China Morning Post
9 April 2018

Chinese munitions makers and sellers are sharing some of their top military hardware and knowledge with overseas buyers, and improving after-sales services as the manufacturers try to hang on to market share in an increasingly competitive arms market.
In the most recent deal, state-owned China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation (CSIC) and the Royal Thai Armed Forces agreed late last month to collaborate on development of military equipment and technology.
The deal follows the Thai government's decision last year to spend US$393 million on Chinese submarines.
A Chinese military insider told the South China Morning Post that the submarine deal included the transfer of some of the country's patented shipbuilding technologies such as submarine manufacturing intellectual property (IP).
China would also help Thailand foster shipbuilding expertise and become more competitive in the field, the insider said.
"China is going to sell its advanced air-independent propulsion [AIP] system to the Thai navy. It might also share some of its advanced stealth technology for submarines and warship weapons with Thailand," the source said, adding that the transfers will depend on Thailand's shipbuilding standards.
China's AIP technology allows its Type 039A diesel-electric submarines to operate at great depths for up to three weeks at a time.
Beijing-based military specialist Li Jie said the United States and European countries had long used arms technology transfers to help forge new strategic partnerships, tactics that China was now also going to deploy.
"China has started [sharing] some of its advanced military technologies, but only on the condition that it not harm the country's overall core technological development," Li said.
Li said Beijing backed the Thai deal because Bangkok was a big supporter of China's "Belt and Road Initiative", especially the high-speed rail link between China and Thailand.
The belt and road plans are a massive infrastructure drive to revive ancient trade routes to link China to Asia, Africa and Europe.
The Thai submarine development comes just a few months after IHS Jane's Defence Weekly reported that China Shipbuilding and Offshore International Company, the international trading arm of CSIC, planned to open a facility in Thailand to provide engineering support and other services to the Thai navy as part of the company's after-sales services.
And just over a year ago, state-owned China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) signed a partnership deal with Saudi Arabia to set up set up the first factory in the Middle East for the Chinese hunter-killer aerial drone the Rainbow 4.
Similar factories for Chinese drone technology have been built in Pakistan and Myanmar, expanding access to the hardware.
Beijing-based military observer Zhou Chenming said the Saudi production line would also assemble associated equipment, which would improve after-sales services for China's clients in the Middle East.
Zhou said the deals were part of Beijing's ongoing efforts to build China's arms brand in the global market.
"China has to upgrade technological value of its arms exports amid increasing global competition," he said.
He said that as production costs had risen, Chinese weapons had become more expensive than those made by various Eastern European nations, such as Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Ukraine.
Those nations have reportedly increased arms sales to the Middle East in the last few years, cutting into China's sales in the region.

India, Russia Set To Ink Rs 39,000-Cr Air Defence System Deal In Oct

Shishir Gupta and Rahul Singh, Hindustan Times
5 April 2018

India is expected to hammer out a Rs 39,000-crore deal with Russia for S-400 Triumf air defence missile systems this October when Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Vlamidir Putin meet in New Delhi for the annual summit between the two countries, top government officials tracking the deal said on condition of anonymity.
India is in talks with Russia to buy five advanced S-400 missile systems, capable of destroying jets, missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) at a range of 400km.
Wide-ranging discussions on several military projects, including the proposed S-400 deal, took place between defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who is currently in Moscow, and top Russian leaders such as Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin and defence minister Sergei Shoigu, one of the officials cited in the first instance said.
The Indian Air Force wants to induct the missile systems at the earliest to shore up its defences in the northern and western sectors.
Sitharaman’s visit also seeks to lay the groundwork for an upcoming multi-nation army drill that will see the armies of India, China and Pakistan carry out joint exercises for the first time under the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) umbrella, the first official added.
The military drills are scheduled to take place in Chelyabinsk in Russia’s Ural mountainous region in June. The upcoming drills will be discussed when Sitharaman visits China in April-end for the SCO defence ministerial meet. She leaves for China on April 24. India will deploy Russian-origin equipment during the exercise.
India and Russia are also likely to ink a deal for four more Krivak/Talwar class stealth frigates before the India-Russia annual summit, said another senior official familiar with the negotiations. Two of the frigates will be imported from Russia, while the remaining two will be built at the public sector Goa Shipyard Limited (GSL).
A senior GSL official said Russian delegations have been visiting the shipyard and are satisfied with the production facilities. India inked an Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) with Russia for the four frigates in 2016.
HT learns that price negotiations are at an advanced stage for leasing out a second Akula-II nuclear-powered attack submarine from Russia. The IGA for the $2-billion deal was inked at a summit-level meeting between Modi and Putin in Goa two years ago.
The Indian Navy is likely to induct the new submarine in 2021 when INS Chakra, also a leased Akula-II submarine, is returned to Russia. INS Chakra was commissioned into the navy in April 2012.
The upcoming deals will further consolidate Russia’s position in the Indian defence market. Russia, the country’s top arms supplier, accounted for 62% of India’s arms imports during 2013–17, followed by the US (15%) and Israel (11%), according to report released by Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in March.
Other key issues that Sitharaman discussed with the Russians include Russia’s assistance for speeding up the Indigenous Aircraft Carrier-I (Vikrant) project and joint manufacturing of spares for Russian-origin military equipment.

U.S. Navy Ramping Up Fleet and Technologies To Face New Threats

Edward J. Walsh, Military and Aerospace
4 April 2018 

U.S. Navy leaders spent much of 2017 campaigning for their plan for dramatic increases in the size of the surface ship and submarine fleet to 355 vessels — the number endorsed by its Force Structure Assessment of 2016 as a minimum necessary to meet a range of emerging threats worldwide. The Navy today has about 280 ships.
Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. John Richardson, in a midyear white paper, entitled "The Future Navy," warned that "a 355-ship Navy using current technology is insufficient for maintaining maritime superiority… We must also implement new ways of operating our battle fleet, which will comprise new types of ships."
Operationally, the surface Navy continued to push hard to implement its "Distributed Lethality" vision, pioneered by Surface Forces Commander Vice Adm. Thomas Rowden. The Rowden mantra, "if it floats, it fights," calls for finding innovative ways to pack more offensive firepower onto surface ships.
The Lockheed Martin Aegis combat system is being upgraded for Navy destroyers and cruisers with updated computers and networking, as well as a new radar system from Raytheon.
The Navy achieved decisive progress during the year in shipbuilding and in developing and fielding new weapon, sensor, command and control, and shipboard power systems.
Meanwhile, in a tumultuous year for U.S. foreign and defense policy, independent analyses from the Navy, U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), and independent organizations focused on growing security threats, dominated by the risk of nuclear attack by North Korea on South Korea, Japan, or even the U.S. mainland.
In year-end comments, former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen said he believes the U.S. is closer to nuclear war with North Korea than ever before. Policy makers and defense experts discussed scenarios for conventional conflict on the Korean peninsula.
U.S. strategy for those contingencies assumes a major role for the Navy’s so-called large surface combatants — Arleigh Burkeclass (DDG 51) destroyers and Ticonderoga-class (CG 47) cruisers. Those ships, capable of launching long-range Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles, also would provide a critical component of U.S. ballistic missile defense.
The Russian navy continues to add new ships to its surface fleet, such as the Russian cruiser Admiral Panteleyev shown arriving at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.
The 355-ship goal includes a force of 104 cruisers and destroyers, up from 88 for the previous 308-ship target.
The Navy’s top priority remains construction of the future strategic ballistic missile submarine USS Columbia (SSBN X), the first in a new class of nuclear missile submarines that will replace the long-deployed Ohio class. Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer called Columbia "the most important acquisition program the Navy has today," and Navy leaders expect the new undersea vessel to enter service in 2030.
Strength of U.S. adversaries
Richardson’s white paper warned of the increasing military strength of Russia and China, as well as Iran. "Both Russia and China can compete on a global scale, in all domains, and at competitive speed," adding that "they both possess considerable space, cyber, and nuclear forces."
The CNO wrote that China’s goals are reflected in its shipbuilding efforts which, analysts say, are proceeding at a "frenetic pace." He points out that China has built three ballistic missile submarines since 2009, and last year commissioned 18 new ships.
The Navy is nearing completion of its versatile San Antonio class of amphibious warfare ships, such as the USS Portland (LPD 27), shown underway during sea trials in the Gulf of Mexico last summer.
He notes that the Russian navy has continued to build modern frigates and corvettes, and expanded its operations in the Baltic, Black, Mediterranean, and Caspian seas, adding that Russia in 2017 launched its second Yasen-class nuclear attack submarine — "the latest step in a plan to recapitalize its submarine force."
Richardson also writes that Iran’s "growing naval forces routinely exhibit provocative behavior in the Straits of Hormuz, Arabian Gulf, and beyond. The Iranians’ support to proxies throughout the Middle East shows no signs of lessening."
Future frigate and LCS
In a December study of Navy shipbuilding, the Congressional Research Service said that meeting the 355-ship goal would require building 47 ships above the previous force-level goal of 308 ships. The Navy’s 2018 budget requested funding for nine new ships. The CRS estimated that the Navy would have to add 57 to 67 ships to Navy’s 2017 30-year shipbuilding plan to maintain that number for the full 30 years. Maintaining that level for 10 years longer, out to 2057, would require building 73 to 77 ships.
The fiscal 2019 proposed Navy shipbuilding budget calls for funding two new Virginia-class fast attack submarines for $7.4 billion; three Arleigh Burke-class missile destroyers for $6 billion; one littoral combat ship for $1.3 billion; one Ford-class aircraft carrier for $1.8 billion; two fleet replenishment oiler ships for $1.1 billion; and one expeditionary sea base for $700 million.
The industry teams building the two variants of the littoral combat ship (LCS) — Lockheed Martin and Fincantieri Marinette Marine for Freedom LCS 1 vessel, and Austal USA and General Dynamics for the Independence LCS 2 vessel — delivered three ships in 2017, for a total of 11 with 18 more under construction, in pre-construction phases, and under contract. In December, the Navy commissioned the newest ship, USS Little Rock (LCS 9) in Buffalo, N.Y.
The Freedom variant is built on a traditional semi-planing monohull, displacing about 3,500 tons fully loaded. The Freedom ships are assigned odd numbers. The Independence variant is a "trimaran," displacing roughly 3,200 tons; the ships have even hull numbers. Both variants are capable of a top speed of 40-plus knots.
The LCSs are designed to conduct surface and anti-submarine warfare and mine countermeasures by means of separate mission packages configured for each warfare area.
In a statement released late last year, the Program Executive Office for LCS said the Navy is committed to a force of 52 small surface combatants consisting of LCSs and a new multimission frigate called FFG(X). The Navy plans to award a contract for FFG(X) concept design this spring, and a construction contract in 2020 for a fleet of 20 ships, which would replace the Navy’s now-retired Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigates.
Navy officials say they will consider any hull form — foreign and domestic — that meets their requirements. The ships will be built in U.S. shipyards. The Navy will specify the mix of combat systems, "to maximize capability, interoperability, and commonality, and reduce development, integration, and future modernization costs."
The Navy is building Zumwalt-class destroyers, such as the lead ship USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000) shown arriving in San Diego last December.
The Navy released a request for information, or RFI, from industry for the FFG(X) in early July, looking for concepts on how to incorporate missile launch systems that could handle the evolved Seasparrow and SM-2 Standard air-defense missiles.
The RFI says the ship will rely heavily on unmanned systems for gathering intelligence, and identifies required systems, among them the COMBATSS-21 combat system now aboard the Freedom LCS variants, a vertical launch system, SeaRAM Mk 15 anti-ship missile, SLQ-32(v)6 electronic warfare system, SQQ-89F undersea warfare system, and the Mk 110 57-millimeter gun.
Both LCS teams are competing for the frigate program. Fincantieri and Lockheed are offering a design for a frigate called FREMM (roughly, Frigate European Multi-Mission). Fincantieri has built six for the Italian navy and four for the French navy. Fincantieri will act as prime for the team for the FFG(X), whereas Lockheed is prime for LCS.
Austal and General Dynamics Mission Systems are proposing a modified trimaran similar in length and beam to the Independence LCS, but with a shorter helicopter deck.
Burke-class destroyers
In late June the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) awarded a long-awaited contract for construction of the destroyer Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125), the first "Flight III" Burke-class destroyer, to Huntington Ingalls Industries. The Flight III ships will be equipped with the SPY-6 air missile defense radar (AMDR), built by Raytheon for tracking and targeting ballistic missiles.
The SPY-6 award to Raytheon in October 2013 broke the long run of wins for Lockheed Martin for the SPY series of radars for the Burkeclass destroyers and Ticonderogaclass cruisers.
In late September, the Navy awarded a second Flight III contract, for DDG 126, to General Dynamics Bath Iron Works, along with a contract for construction of DDG 127, funded in 2016 as the final Flight IIA ship. Both ships are planned for completion in 2024.
Shipbuilders continue to stampout new Flight IIA Burkes. In September, Huntington Ingalls launched Delbert D. Black (DDG 119). In mid-November, the yard delivered the 64th ship of the class, Ralph Johnson (DDG 114) to the Navy and laid the keel for Lenah H. Sutcliffee Higbee (DDG 123). Huntington also is building Paul Ignatius (DDG 117), and Frank E. Petersen Jr (DDG 121).
General Dynamics Bath delivered Rafael Peralta (DDG 115) and is building Thomas Hudner (DDG 116), Daniel Inouye (DDG 118), and Carl M. Levin (DDG 120). The Navy also has authorized funding for construction at Bath of John Basilione (DDG 122) and Harvey C. Barnum (DDG 124).
Bath also laid the keel in early 2017 for Lyndon B. Johnson (DDG 1002) the third of a new class of three Zumwalt-class (DDG 1000) land-attack destroyers. Zumwalt commissioned last October and is going through post-delivery testing in San Diego, aiming at initial operation in 2020. Michael Monsoor (DDG 1001) is nearly complete and set for delivery this month. Johnson is completing hull integration and will go in the water in early 2019.
Meanwhile, NAVSEA took steps to repair John S. McCain (DDG 56) and Fitzgerald (DDG 62), which were severely damaged in collisions with commercial ships — Fitzgerald in June about 90 miles south of Tokyo, and McCain in late August in the Singapore Straits. Seven sailors were lost in the Fitzgerald tragedy, and 10 sailors perished in the McCain collision. McCain was transported to Yokosuka, Japan in late October. Fitzgerald will undergo repairs at the Huntington Ingalls Pascagoula, Miss., yard.
A Navy investigation concluded that both collisions were avoidable and caused by leadership and seamanship failures.
The Northrop Grumman MQ-8C Fire Scout unmanned helicopter will go aboard the Navy littoral combat ship, as well as other surface combatants, for intelligence-gathering, surveillance, reconnaissance, and targeting.
Ticonderoga-class cruisers
The Navy now has 22 Ticonderogaclass cruisers, down from the original 27-ship fleet. In 2004 and 2005, the oldest
five ships were taken out of service when the Navy decided that putting them through a comprehensive Aegis modernization program would be too expensive. The first ship of the class launched in 1981, and the last of the class, USS Port Royal (CG 73) launched in 1992, ending Ticonderoga-class cruiser production. The Navy operates no other cruisers than the Ticonderoga class.
Aegis modernization aims at adding new capability for the Aegis combat system with new computer software, provided in advanced process builds (ACBs) that support introduction of Aegis baseline 9, which provides integrated air and missile defense (IAMD) for the CGs and DDGs, and ballistic missile defense (BMD) for the destroyers. Modernization also brings upgrades for air, surface, and undersea warfare systems and new ship machinery and power systems.
The new systems include the cooperative engagement capability (CEC) developed by Raytheon, a SPQ-9B surface search radar built by Northrop Grumman, and a Naval integrated fire control-counter air (NIFC-CA) capability.
The CEC creates a consolidated target-track picture by integrating radar contact data drawn from several ships operating in a network. The system thereby enables all ships participating in the network to view the consolidated track picture for situational awareness and targeting.
In 2014, Congress rejected a Navy request to keep the older 11 of the 22 cruisers in service and put the newer 11 in a reduced operating status for a modernization program, then use them to replace the older 11. Instead, Congress produced a "2/4/6" plan, meaning that two cruisers per year could start modernization for no more than four years, with no more than six in modernization at any time.
Two cruisers, Cowpens and Gettysburg, went into modernization in 2015 and two more ships in 2016, leaving seven still to be modernized. The work included extensive upgrades to the Aegis combat system to give the ships a ballistic-missile-defense capability.
The Navy proposed that instead of another two ships in 2017, all seven go into modernization, in part to provide needed work for the shipyards. According to many reports, Congress didn’t trust the Navy to bring those older ships back to the fleet. The House Armed Services Committee report on the 2018 defense authorization act prohibited spending any money to retire or inactivate any cruiser.
Amphibious warfare ships
In addition to progress on the Burkes, Huntington Ingalls laid the keel for Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28), the 12th ship of the San Antonio class of amphibious transport ships. The yard had delivered Portland (LPD 27) to the Navy in September, three months after winning the Navy contract in June for construction of LPD 29, the last ship of the class. The Navy commissioned John P. Murtha (LPD 26), in July.
The new LPDs are 684 feet long and displace about 25,000 tons. The ships are capable of landing Marine assault forces from landing craft launched from the ship’s welldeck and from MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft off the flight deck.
In late 2015, the Navy and Marine Corps leadership agreed that the San Antonio design would be the baseline for a new class, the LX(R) to replace the Whidbey Island-class (LSD 41) and Harpers Ferry-class (LSD 49) dock landing ships. The Navy plans to build 13 LX(R)s starting with first funding in 2020.
Three San Antonio-class amphibious transport ships, New York (LPD 21), Arlington (LPD 24), and Somerset (LPD 25) are named to honor the victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, with New York’s bow cast with steel from the World Trade Center.
The Navy christened the second America-class landing helicopter assault ship, Tripoli (LHA 7), at Huntington in September, aiming at delivery later this year. The America class, initially called LHA(R) because they replace five Tarawa-class LHAs, are derivatives of the Waspclass, with an enlarged hangar deck, greater aviation storage and fuel capacity, and the ability to deliver Marines by MV-22s and helicopters as well as by landing craft. America and Tripoli are designated Flight 0 ships.
In June, NAVSEA awarded Huntington a modification to its contract for detail design and construction of LHA 8, the first Flight 1 LHA(R), with completion set for 2024.
The LHAs are 844 feet long and displace 45,000 tons, and are powered by a hybrid propulsion and power system. The power plant consists of gas turbine engines and an auxiliary power system employing induction motors to power the ship at lower speeds.
The Navy says that when Tripoli joins the fleet, it will be the first LHA(R) to go to sea able to support a Marine Corps aviation component that includes the F-35 joint strike fighter.
Submarines
In September, the Navy took delivery of Colorado (SSN 788), the 15th Virginia-class fast attack submarine, after accepting delivery of the 14th ship of the class, Washington (SSN 787) in May. Colorado is the fifth Block III ship. The Block III upgrade includes a redesigned bow that accommodates a large-aperture passive bow array and new 87-inch Virginia payload tubes capable of launching six Tomahawk cruise missiles. The tubes replace 12 individual vertical-launch tubes.
The Virginia class will introduce a Block IV configuration consisting of design changes for hulls 792 through 801, and in 2019 a Block V, which will add a Virginia payload module of four additional payload tubes, each able to launch seven Tomahawks.
George Drakeley, executive director for Navy Program Executive Office (PEO) Submarines, said in January that the PEO has developed an integrated enterprise plan for the Columbia and Virginia programs, which aims at completing the Columbia design in the same amount of time as Virginia, although Columbia is 2.5 times the size of the Virginia boats.
He says the PEO also has introduced a submarine warfare tactical system (SWTS) to accelerate insertion of new computer hardware and software for the sonar, combat system, electronic warfare, and other ship systems for all the Navy’s attack boats (SSNs) as well as the Ohio-class ballistic missile "boomers" (SSBNs) and guided-missile subs (SSGNs — four converted Ohio-class ships). SWTS supplants the acoustic rapid COTs insertion (A-RCI) initiative for sonars for the Virginia class.
Ship systems
The surface Navy has achieved key milestones in moving new combat, command and control, and ship machinery systems to the fleet. Key initiatives are the SPY-6 AMDR and advances for the Aegis combat system software for air defense and BMD.
The Raytheon SPY-6 air missile defense radar (AMDR) will go aboard Flight III Burke-class destroyers to improve fleet surveillance, aircraft tracking, and ballistic missile defense.
In the first operational test of the AMDR engineering development model (EDM) in March 2017 at the Pacific Missile Range in Hawaii, the EDM detected and tracked a shortrange ballistic missile. In late July, the EDM passed a similar tracking test with a medium-range ballistic missile target.
Raytheon uses gallium nitride (GaN) technology for the fabrication of SPY-6 radar module assemblies, which permits higher power density and great power efficiency. In 2013, DOD recognized Raytheon for achieving "Manufacturing Readiness Level 8," the highest possible, for its GaN work.
The air- and missile-defense capability of the Aegis fleet comes from integrating the combat system computer with the SPY radar — SPY-1A for the cruisers and SPY-1D for the Burkes up to the last of the Flight IIA ships. Those ships will receive the Aegis baseline 9 program in several versions. The Flight III Burkes will get baseline 10 and BMD program 6.0 for the SPY-6. Baseline 9 already is aboard several ships, and Lockheed Martin is working on baseline 10.
Integration of the Raytheon-built radar with the Lockheed Martindeveloped combat system is a key challenge for the program. Engineers of both companies have been working the problem at the Hawaii test site. Following the Hawaii test program, the EDM will be shipped to Lockheed Martin’s Moorestown N.J., site for more integration work.
Enabling technologies for Navy ships and submarines
• Shipboard power control and conditioning radar
• radar-control software
• electro-optical sensors
• digital signal processing
• command and control
• sensor fusion software
• real-time data networking
• high-performance embedded computing
• weapons fire control
• gallium nitride radar components
• shipboard communications equipment
In early April, the Navy conducted four launches of the Block 1 Standard SM-6 air defense missile, bringing the SM-6 to full operational capability. In another round of tests in early June at the White Sands Missile Range, N.M., the Block 1A SM-6 demonstrated full-range integration with the Aegis combat system. The Block 1A missile is set to achieve initial operational capability late this year.
In other Aegis-related work, DRS Technologies Canada Ltd. in Kanata, Ontario, will start deliveries this summer of four shipsets of an integrated voice communications system (IVCS) for backfit to Bulkeley (DDG 84) and McCampbell (DDG 85) and for installation during construction of the first two Flight III ships, DDGs 125 and 126. The company says the IVCS is a "hybrid" system consisting of some 400 individual communications devices, including 200 Avaya digital non-secure telephones, loudspeakers, phone jacks, and ruggedized cabinets and mounts that provides a communications network accessible in every ship space. The IVCS is integrated with a mission-critical secure voice system for tactical operations.
Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems, which provides the CEC processor and antenna, received a $71 million modification to a Navy contract for 2018 options for CEC design agent services.
Also for the cruisers and destroyers, BAE Systems Land & Armaments won an order from the Naval Surface Warfare Center’s Indian Head division for four upgraded Mk 45 mod 4 five-inch/62-caliber gun mounts, enhancing the Mk 45 surface warfare capability with the longer 62-caliber barrel. The gun is capable of firing rounds out to a 20-mile range for surface, anti-air, and Naval surface fire support for units ashore.
General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems of Williston, Vt., won a contract for production options for the Mk 82 missile fire control system and Mk 200 director controller equipment, both of which are key components of the Aegis Mk 99 fire control system.
In October, Northrop Grumman won a Navy award for integration of a new radar into the Fire Scout virtual takeoff unmanned aerial vehicle. The Fire Scout is set for fielding on LCSs and possibly other surface ships for intelligence-gathering, surveillance, reconnaissance, and targeting.
The Fire Scout C version is fitted with an electro-optical/infrared sensor and will be getting a high-frequency active electronically scanned array radar provided by Leonardo Finemeccanica. The MQ-8C is set for initial operational test and evaluation late this year.
Ship power
The new combat systems, radars, and weapons destined for new ships are heavy consumers of ship-generated electrical power. To find the necessary power, the Navy is seeking new ways to generate, distribute, and manage power for those power-hungry systems.
In April, the Naval Surface Warfare Center’s Philadelphia Division awarded an $8.3 million contract to American Superconductor Corp. in Devens, Mass., for engineering support of high-temperature superconducting systems, including high-temperature magnets. The company has done extensive work for the Naval Research Laboratory on superconductor motors that potentially could go aboard surface ships.
Philadelphia Gear Corp. in King of Prussia, Pa., won a $98 million contract last April for three shipsets of main reduction gears for DDGs-125, -126, and -127. The main reduction gears (two per ship, one for each propulsion shaft) transmit power from the main propulsion gas turbine engines to the shafts.
In June, NAVSEA awarded an order to General Electric Power Conversion in Paris to support the Zumwalt-class destroyer high-voltage power system, which consists of an advanced induction motor, motor drive, harmonic filters, and resistors. The system distributes power from the ship’s turbine generators to all ship loads, including weapons and propulsion.
In late summer, DRS Systems won a $32.2 million award for support for the Zumwalt integrated power system’s low-voltage power system. The Zumwalt’s power architecture, called the integrated fight-through power system or IFTPS, is the Navy’s biggest step forward towards full-up integrated electric drive power generation for the surface combatant fleet.